project planner

carbon calculator

case studies

guides

about

Guides
Simple guidance and resources, from us to you

To help you get the most out of our tools and to support you on your circular journey, we've put together guidance and resources, grouped by category.

Think anything's missing or want to contribute? Let us know!

Carbon Calculator

Here's some more info to help advanced users get the most from our carbon calculator tool.

About the CIBSE TM65 method

You can get more information about the method, or purchase a copy, from the CIBSE website.

TM65.2 is a simplified LCA (life-cycle assessment) method developed by CIBSE to help stakeholders in the building services sector estimate embodied carbon of products. This allows us to use a consistent method to compare options and assess relative impacts. Life-cycle assessment is a process which looks at all the stages in a product’s lifetime, starting with material extraction and ending with disposal, and estimates the total environmental impacts that will occur, on average.

These environmental impacts are summarised into a single indicator “carbon”. Because different greenhouse gases contribute to global warming in different ways, this attempts to simplify the output by expressing all impacts as the equivalent amount of carbon dioxide being emitted into the atmosphere.

It’s important to treat outputs from this method as estimates. If a more detailed figure is needed, a full LCA conducted by a professional would be required, as well as detailed data collection about many aspects of the business and supplychain.

The data presented in this document are intended to be useful as a relative comparison between different option, products or scenarios, and as a first estimate to explore the potential scale of environmental impacts / benefits before selecting a circular lighting approach.

Environmental impacts are broken up into the following stages:

Stage A1: Estimates the impacts associated with material extraction. These are the raw materials which are used in the manufacture of the product.

Stage A2: Estimates the impacts associated with transporting the raw materials or components to the factory. While in reality complex electronic products are often manufactured and assembled in many locations, often on a global basis, this method focuses on the final assembly location.

Stage A3: Considers the impacts incurred as a result of energy use during manufacturing.

Stage A4: Estimates the environmental impact of transporting the finished product(s) to the installation site

Stage B3: Estimates the environmental impact of manufacturing and disposing of components replaced during repairs in the product's service life.

Stage C2: Estimates the environmental impact associated with transporting the product from the installation site to the waste processing location

Stage C3: Estimates the impact incurred during waste processing operations

Stage C4: Estimates the impact associated with landfill materials left after other waste processing has taken place

The method makes a number of assumptions, which are partially explained here, as well as key areas that the Circular Lighting calculator differs from or builds upon TM65 assumptions.

The method estimates embodied carbon emissions using the CIBSE TM65 method, supported by the TM65.2 addendum. The method also estimates a circular scenario (either reuse or remanufacture) by making additional assumptions. The general approach to this is assuming that the product is constructed exactly the same in the two scenarios, but certain components are reused.

In A1, the emissions associated with material extraction is assumed to be equal to the weight of the component multiplied by an emissions factor which corresponds to the component's material category (source: TM65 table 2.1, TM65.2 table 9)

In A1, in the circular scenario, when a component is reused, it is assumed to result in zero emissions from material extraction (A1=0).

In A2, the distance a component travels to reach the factory is assumed to be 3000km by HGV (source: TM65 4.3.3.3). In a circular scenario, it's instead assumed that reused components travel the factory-to-site distance, again by HGV. The emissions factor for transport by HGV is assumed to be 0.132kgCO2e/t km (source: TM65 4.3.3.2).

In A3, for new product scenarios, energy use is estimated to be equal to production duration multiplied by average power consumption of the factory. This allows users to make a basic assumption rather than being expected to know the attributable energy use itself. The corresponding emissions are assumed to be equal to the energy use multiplied by a carbon emissions factor selected depending on the region of manufacture (source: TM65 4.3.3.4).

In A3, if the circular scenario is remanufacturing, the amount of energy used during remanufacturing is assumed to be the same as for the new product scenario. When estimating carbon resulting from this energy consumption, the location of production in the circular scenario is always assumed to be the UK, which has a relatively decarbonised energy grid.

In A3, if the circular scenario is reuse, the energy used during reuse is assumed to be zero (A3=0).

In A4, it’s always assumed that the circular product is transported from the factory to the site by HGV.

In A4, in the new scenario, if the factory to site distance is more than 1500km, it’s assumed that 20% of the distance is done by sea, with the rest done by HGV (source: TM65 4.3.3.6, modified).

In B3, the emissions associated with manufacturing spare components and disposing of faulty ones during the product's service life is calculated. This is done by summing all the stage A and C emissions (i.e. manufacturing and disposal), multiplying by the scaleup factor and multiplying by the user-specified repair percentage (default: 10% - source: TM65 4.3.2). The repair percentage is assumed to apply to the embodied carbon rather than the percentage of product weight replaced or percentage of components replaced (source: TM65 4.3.2.2). The same percentage is then applied in the same way to both new and circular scenarios, which results in a different estimate of emissions associated with repair.

The factory-to-site (A2) and site-to-waste (C2) distances are assumed to be the same for both circular and new product scenarios.

In C3, the energy used during waste processing is assumed to be equal to the energy used during production of the product (source: TM65 4.3.2.3), however, processing is assumed to be done in the UK, with associated electricity carbon intensity factor.

In C4, in both new and circular scenarios, disposal emissions are estimated using the assumption that 55% of the product will result in landfill and 45% in recycling (source: TM65 4.3.3.8). The landfill emissions are assumed to be 0.0089kgCO2e/kg (source: TM65 4.3.3.9).

A scaleup factor of 1.3 is used to compensate for emissions which are not accounted for due to the simplicity of the method (source: TM65 4.3.2). Whereas in the TM65 method, this multiplication factor is applied after summing each stage, this is instead applied to each stage before summing.

Using a custom BOM template

The tool lets you create and then upload a csv file containing information about a luminaire, enabling you to be more specific about the materials and parts contained in the product as well as which parts will be reused and which replaced. You can "save as" csv from all spreadsheet editing softwares.

In order to use this tool effectively, please note the following.

The file should be saved in the UTF-8 and avoid special characters. From excel, select the "CSV UTF-8 (Comma Delimited) (*.csv)" format.

For the "Category", "Material" and "Reused" fields, it's important to ensure there are no extra spaces at the end of cells.

The file must contain all of the following column headings (which must match exactly, including case-sensitive), but the columns can be in different orders:

Description

This column is purely descriptive and is not used by the tool. It's recommended to use a good description about the part to help with record-keeping

Category

Every part must have a category from the following, which must match exactly (including case):

  • Optics and diffusers
  • Main enclosure
  • Brackets and trays
  • LED modules and emitters
  • LED drivers and associated controlgears
  • Sensors and associated controlgears
  • Batteries
  • Battery and emergency related controlgears
  • Wiring
  • Electronics sundry
  • Fixings and fasteners
  • Mechanical sundry

The category field is used by the tool to apply circular scenarios (e.g. whether the component will be reused or replaced), only if the user chooses "Specify Custom" in the user-interface. Otherwise, if the user selects "Use presets" the preferences specified in the "Reused" column will be used.

Material

Every part must have a valid material, which is used to look up carbon intensity as specified in the TM65 and TM65.2 methods. Therefore, the material must match exactly from the following table (source: TM65, TM65.2, modified):

Material Carbon intensity
ABS 3.76
Acrylic (PMMA) 4.02
Aluminium 13.1
Bamboo 0.85
Brass 4.80
Cast iron 1.52
Ceramic 0.70
Copper 3.81
Electronic component 49.00
Expanded polystyrene 3.43
Glass 1.44
Insulation (general) 1.86
Iron 2.03
Lithium 5.30
Nylon 6,6 7.92
Plastics (general) 3.31
Polyamide 9.17
Polycarbonate (PC) 7.62
Polyethylene (PE) 2.54
Polypropylene (PP) 3.96
Polystyrene (PS) 3.43
Polyurethane foam (PU) 4.55
Powder coating (PPC) 4.63
Printed wiring board, mixed mounted 154.00
PVC pipe 3.23
PVC 3.10
Rubber 2.85
Silicone 13.8
Stainless steel 4.40
Steel (general or galvanised) 2.97
Zinc 4.18

It's recommended to use the closest matching material to the part, however, complex products like luminaires often include parts which are themselves complex assemblies made from multiple materials. In this case, either:

  • Use the material which you think constitutes the largest impact (where impact is mass x carbon intensity)
  • Use the composite material "Electronic component" if the part is an electronic assembly

It's also often very difficult to determine material composition of parts without advanced equipment. Especially for plastics, use your best judgement or simply use "Plastics (general)", but note that this has a lower carbon intensity than many other plastics.

Weight

The mass in grams (g) of the component. It's also possible to summarise multiple components into one row, if they have the same material and category. This field is not used in the method - only Total Weight is used.

Qty

The quantity of this component in the product. Again, it's possible to summarise multiple components into Qty 1. This field is not used in the method - only Total Weight is used

Total Weight

The total weight of this component(s). Should equal Weight x Qty

Reused

Specify if the component will be reused or not. Note that you can choose to override these settings in the website by using "circular scenario > specify custom"

The value should match exactly either: "Yes" (which means that the part will be reused in the circular scenario) or "No" which means the part will be recycled/landfilled and replaced with a new part in the circular scenario.

Circularity guide

It can be hard to work out which products can be practically reused or remanufactured and which can't (or at least how challenging or costly it might be!) We've made some notes to help you navigate this tricky topic.

Factors which affect circularity potential

Quantity

More is better! Because each step in the remanufacturing process incurs fixed costs, remanufacturing or reusing more products will spread costs out better.

Materials

Valuable and high-carbon materials will make it more economically and environmentally worthwhile to reuse or remanufacture products. For example, it's often perceived that higher quality products containing aluminium housings retain their value due because of the cost and longeivity of the material as well as its continued function in cooling LED light sources.

Variety

If the project has lots of different luminaires, or even "similar-but-different" luminaires, that could make it very difficult to reuse the luminaires in another site, or for a remanufacturer to work with them. This is because what might seem like minor differences could prevent economies of scale, requiring each 'type' of product to be treated in a different way.

Condition

If products are in as-new condition, then great! However, products in deteriorating condition can pose a challenge for remanufacturing or reuse, where components may need to be carefully assessed and processed to reach an acceptable condition. Consider things like the ageing of plastic (exposure to UV or heating can cause plastics to discolour and become brittle, which can cause mechanical, aesthetic and optical problems), rusting or corrosion which can weaken luminaires mechanically (and aesthetically!) by consuming metal, ageing of plastics or foams in seals which can lead to ingress, ageing of electrical components and especially cable insulation which can lead to risk of electric shock if not addressed.

Building and customer constraints

Site opening hours, access restrictions, operational constraints and other factors relating to building type, age and function are all important to consider when developing a plan for remanufacturing or reusing luminaires.

Legislation changes

If the products are of an older construction, laws and standards may have changed since the products were designed. This can mean it's difficult to place the product back on the market and also applies to unused products coming direct from warehouses or excess stock. While this might rule out reuse, remanufacture can be a great strategy for upgrading products or changing specifications - not just returning to original condition! Wherever there are legal or safety concerns, it's essential to take professional advice from an insured remanufacturer.

Size and bulk

Bigger and heavier makes it harder to transport, however, may indicate that the material and carbon savings of reuse would be greater

construction

The product design has a large impact on circularity. Some things to look out for:

Change of technology

It's great to upgrade products designed for older lighting technologies like fluorescent lamps to LED technology, but there's a lot to consider and it's not always practical and safety is key. Consult a remanufacturer for advise.

Consider the lighting task!

The reuse/remanufacture project needs to ensure the quality of light and other functionality like emergency lighting, controls and IP ratings match the specifications required.

Application requirements

Projects with specific requirements like sector or market specific approvals, military standards or similar may add testing and certification costs and challenges for the remanufacturer to navigate

Purchaser requirements

Procurement practices can both help and hinder circularity initiatives. Larger customers tend to put in place processes which help them to ensure the products and services they procure meet quality, cost-effectiveness and other requirements. Mechanisms like frameworks can also help customers tender work effectively to trusted suppliers while reducing approval overheads. However - these mechanisms can sometimes promote circular or sustainable products or services through scoring metrics, or present a barrier if mechanisms are set up with "business as usual" procurement channels in mind, or make it challenging for smaller organisations to propose circular services.

Identifying environmental hotspots

In-use emissions

Luminaires use electricity to generate light and their annual energy demand depends on how frequently they are on, their brightness (lumen output) and energy efficiency. Products using older lighting technologies like fluorescent tubes or fluorescent bulbs are still in common use across the world, and these are therefore particularly urgent to upgrade to newer light sources; using circular economy approaches can avoid waste when doing so.

It's worth comparing embodied carbon emissions with estimated operational carbon (i.e. in-use emissions, or annual energy use). It's common for 90%+ of lifetime emissions to be operational, meaning that while material waste and embodied carbon are important, energy efficiency is often the primary environmental consideration for luminaires.

Lighting design

Lighting products are selected and used to create a lighting effect in their use environment. The appropriate selection of brightness, optical properties and colour temperature for a particular environment is just as important as focussing on product energy efficiency alone. If light is not properly directed, it can be wasted, whether generated efficiently or not.

Controls and sensors

There are a plethora of lighting controls and sensors available to lighting designers, engineers and remanufacturers. These can assist the user in dimming or switching lights off when ambient light is adequate or when rooms are unoccupied. However, user experience, cost, product interoperability and the embodied carbon of control equipment should all be considered.

Wireless lighting controls are often proprietary and software obsolescence or server shutdowns can pose a risk to users. Interoperability challenges are a significant challenge for reuse of lighting controls, however there are now a number of protocols which aim to support device interoperability which will encourage the reuse of such equipment.

Selecting luminaires and brands

Specifiers and luminaire designers are faced with tradeoff decisions when striving for greater sustainability. More robust and less integrated product design has a good history of encouraging stakeholders to maintain and remanufacture products, however these products are likely to incur more embodied carbon to start with. Lighter products designed with plastics are harder to reuse, remanufacture and also properly recycle, but feature lower embodied carbon emissions to begin with.

There are some general principles to consider: